What Weld's Challenge To Trump's Presidency Means, According To History

What Weld's Challenge To Trump's Presidency Means, According To History




By Christianna Silva


In the
U.S., A president can be president for up to eight years, or two stints of four-year terms. (Franklin D. Roosevelt was the sole exception, as his four back-to-back election wins led to a total term of 12 years; it was only soon after his sudden death that the unwritten rule inspired by George Washington’s declination to one third term became law.) And while it’s rare that a sitting president in his first term wouldn’t seek reelection as his party’s nominee, it’s rarer still that he would face opposition from someone else within that party – although it’s not altogether unheard of.


On April 15, former Massachusetts governor Bill Weld announced that he is going to be officially hard President Donald Trump for the 2020 Republican Party nomination. “I think our nation is in grave peril, and I can no longer sit silently on the sidelines,” he mentioned at an event in New Hampshire upon announcing his exploratory committee. “To compound matters, our president is simply also unstable to complete the duties of the highest executive office — which include the specific duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed — in a competent and professional matter. He is simply in the incorrect place.”


In terms of pedigree, Weld is like a GOP Irritated Lib: he's a descendant of a signer of the Declaration of Independence who was elected governor of Massachusetts in 1990 and was reelected in 1994 by a record margin. He’s the poster child for moderate Republicanism who married a Roosevelt and ran for vice president on the Libertarian Party ticket in 2016 with Gary Johnson. Despite all that, it’s unlikely that he’ll beat the president in a primary race, for the sheer fact that such a feat hasn’t happened since Chester Arthur lost his bid at the GOP convention in 1884 — meaning that it’s never happened in modern politics.


And nevertheless Weld isn’t alone this year, as other Republicans, like Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan and former Ohio Gov. John Kasich, seem to be contemplating challenges themselves. Such discord should make it a whole lot harder for Trump to beat a Democrat in November: Historically, incumbent presidents of the past century who won the nomination immediately after facing serious primary challenges usually went on to lose their general election.


If we’re inclined to listen to the lessons of history (which, in this political climate, is a big *if*), these rare challengers foreshadow failure to win the general election in fall. Perhaps the primary challengers served as an effect, not a cause, of a lost general election, or maybe it’s just correlation without causation. No matter what, it’s an interesting – and potentially negative – sign that Trump is facing at least one Republican challenger in the primaries. Here’s a look back at the most significant primary challengers and why they affected the incumbents’ chance at sustaining their seat in the White House.


Shepard Sherbell/Corbis by means of the Getty Images
Pat Buchanan primaried George H. W. Bush in 1992


In 1992, Pat Buchanan, a former senior aide to both President Richard Nixon and President Ronald Reagan, challenged then-President Bush. He was a tough competitor at the starting of the race, running on a nationalist, right-wing approach, which several experts believe served as a precursor to the campaign on which Trump eventually won. Throughout the primaries leading up to the 1992 Republican National Convention, Buchanan received 37 percent of the vote in New Hampshire, and also more than 25 percent in 11 other states. His challenge also caused Bush to push his own campaign to the correct. Although by the end of the primary, Buchanan was absolutely wrecked at the polls, bringing in just 23 percent of the popular vote and winning zero delegates. Bush took home the Republican nomination.


Bush went on to lose to Bill Clinton in the general election, who brought residence five million more votes than Bush did; that chasm was widened even further by third-party candidate Ross Perot, who famously wrangled a solid 19 million votes of his own. Some political analysts, like the New York Times’s Richard Berke, place blame on Buchanan for Bush’s ultimate loss, saying his apparent acceptance of Buchanan’s extremism may have cost him votes in the general election. In 1999 Washington Post reporter David S. Broder surmised that Buchanan revealed caution about Bush within his own party.


In 1996, Buchanan vied again for the Republican nomination; Bob Dole won that nomination, however lost to Clinton. That wasn’t the end of Buchanan's political career, although, or his impact; in 2017, he ominously told Politico, “The ideas made it, yet I didn’t.”


David Hume Kennerly/Getty Images
Ted Kennedy primaried Jimmy Carter in 1980


President Jimmy Carter wasn’t doing so well heading into his 1980 reelection campaign. He had remarkably low poll ratings, which mixed poorly with his remarkably high confidence, according to the University of Virginia’s Miller Center. As soon as reporters told Carter that Senator Edward Kennedy was tough him in the primary, Carter said: “I’ll whip his ass.”


Carter won renomination, but whip ass he did not; Kennedy took 12 delegates and 37 percent of the vote. Carter went into the general election wounded, while Ronald Reagan cruised to the Republican nomination. In November, Carter lost the general election to Reagan by nearly 10 percentage points.


Tony Korody/Sygma/Sygma by way of the Getty Images
Ronald Reagan primaried Gerald Ford in 1976


Reagan conquering Carter in 1980 wasn’t his first foray into politics; in 1976, he mounted a primary challenge against President Gerald Ford. Ford was an incumbent, sure, yet a strange one: he had only taken the seat soon after Nixon resigned in the wake of the Watergate scandal and had never actually won a presidential election. Even still, he won the Republican primary immediately after bringing in just 43 more delegates and fewer than one million more votes than Reagan.


In November, Ford lost to Carter by just two percentage points and fewer than 60 electoral votes.


Bettmann / Getty Images
Pete McCloskey tried to primary Richard Nixon in 1972


McCloskey, a Republican representative from California who ran on an anti-war platform, acquired 20 percent of the vote in the New Hampshire Republican primary before pulling out of the race. Nixon then sailed to a GOP nomination and went on to win the general election. (Of course, he eventually had to resign in 1974… however not even a primary contender would have been likely to predict the Watergate scandal, and its ensuing fallout.)


Bettman / Getty Images
Robert Kennedy primaried Lyndon Johnson in 1968


In 1968, Lyndon Johnson, who assumed presidency after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, was primaried by Minnesota Senator Eugene McCarthy and New York Senator Robert F. Kennedy. Johnson rapidly withdrew immediately after Robert F. Kennedy entered it, and his vice president, Hubert Humphrey, entered the race. Kennedy was assassinated in Los Angeles on June 5, 1968, and Humphrey won the Democratic nomination. In the final race, Richard Nixon, the Republican nominee, won the election by less than one million popular votes.


Paul Schutzer/The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty Images
Everyone primaried Harry Truman in 1952


Then-President Harry Truman entered the 1952 race with a plummeting popularity rating because the Korean War dragged on to its third year. The Democrat was primaried by a whopping five other candidates, including Estes Kefauver, Pat Brown, Richard Russell Jr., Hubert Humphrey, and W. Averell Harriman. Truman ultimately did  not seek reelection. Adlai Stevenson, the former governor of Illinois, won the Democratic nomination, nevertheless lost the general election to Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower, who won by more than 10 percentage points in a landslide victory.









Leave a Comment

Have something to discuss? You can use the form below, to leave your thoughts or opinion regarding What Weld's Challenge To Trump's Presidency Means, According To History.

Politics News