How Voters Can Turn Climate Change Anxiety Into Policy

By Thor Benson


“The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it,” celebrated astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson once tweeted. There really is overwhelming evidence that the climate is changing and that it’s partially due to human behavior. Despite this evidence, several don’t believe the climate is changing, or they feel that human beings are not to blame if it is changing. Several mention the climate has habitually changed, so it’s nothing to worry about, yet the fact is the rate of change has escalated in dangerous ways and human civilization isn't at all ready for the effects of this.


A University of Michigan and Muhlenberg College survey from July noticed that around 60% of Residents of the
U.S. Believe the climate is changing and that human activity is playing a role in this change. In terms of how people from different ideological backgrounds feel, it was noticed 50% of Republicans believe the climate is changing, while 90% of Democrats believe this. Experts mention that no identifier is more critical than party affiliation for determining if someone will believe in man-made climate change.


“If I only got one question ask to decide in the event you accept that climate change is real… I would ask you your party,” Christopher Borick, the director of the Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Advice, tells MTV News. “The thing that matters the most is your political leanings.”


That mentioned, Borick mentioned increasingly conservatives are beginning to accept that the climate is changing and that human activity is a factor. Outdoors of political leanings, Borick mentioned younger folks are more likely to be concerned about climate change than older people. Over 90% of millennials believe climate change is occurring.


“People of color usually are more concerned about climate change than white people. They are also more ready to support measures to deal with climate change, both by reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and by adapting to changes that are already happening and are likely to come,” says Jon Christensen, an adjunct assistant professor in the Institute of the Environment and Maintainability at UCLA. “Younger folks are more concerned than older people, and ladies are more concerned than men.”


Outside of how people feel about climate change, there really is the question of if how they feel about climate change motivates them to vote in certain ways. Though a majority of Residents of the
U.S. Mention climate change is a crucial provide to them, they usually rank it significantly lower in importance than things like the economy, national security and healthcare.


Edward Maibach, director of the Center for Climate Change Communication at George Mason University, says that liberal Democrats and moderate Democrats are the most motivated by climate change any time it comes to going to the polls. He mentioned young Republicans are motivated by it to some degree although not usually enough to vote for a Democrat over it.


“Independents are the most crucial sort of voters in the general election, because they can go either way,” Maibach mentioned. “A solid majority of Independents support climate action, and desire to be able to see Congress and the president do more to address it.”


Climate change has the potential to wipe out humanity, so you’d think it’d be at the best of people’s lists in terms of importance every year. Although, because of how people view political issues and because they tend concentrate on temporary, personalized issues, it’s hard to stimulate people to put climate change above their own revenue or their own healthcare.


Borick mentioned people tend to think about the upfront expenses of addressing climate change first, which means they’re not thinking about the long-term advantages of tackling the distribute. He mentioned in case you hope to get people to care about climate change, you need to show them the temporary advantages of addressing it, rather than just depicting “doom and gloom.”


“Trying to create the case that you could address a lot of problems while you’re also addressing climate change is a good way to show the breadth of how critical this is,” Borick said.


“To earn votes on the climate provide, candidates should be talking about the advantages of greatly accelerating the inevitable transition to tidy energy, which include cleaner air and water, better health, and greater economic prosperity,” Maibach said.


Alternatively opposed to telling each person they’re sending their grandkids into hellfire if they don’t vote for candidates who will fight climate change, politicians and other political leaders should explain how the air we breathe and the water we drink can become cleaner by fighting climate change. New jobs in innovative fields will become accessible if we begin fighting climate change. These are the things voters respond to.


Voters will also become motivated to address the distribute problem of climate change any time as soon as they begin seeing the negative effects of it in their day-to-day lives. Ideally, we’d address it before then, nevertheless it’s likely several will care more about addressing it whenever they begin noticing the repercussions of not addressing it.


“Experienced weather over the last few years, I think, is raising the saliency of the offer for a lot of folks,” Borick mentioned. “They’re seeing it more. I think Residents of the
U.S. Are experiencing it more. That makes it much less theoretical and much less long-term and more personalized and immediate.”


Borick mentioned people on the west side of the nation experiencing drought and fires is making them more concerned about climate change. People in the Southeast experiencing historic hurricanes is making them think more about the climate. We’re already seeing how the dangers of climate change are making people rethink how they vote.


“Globally it usually be true that people who are more likely to be hurt by climate change or are already being hurt by it seem to be more concerned and more cooperative of actions to deal with it,” Christensen mentioned. “This exposure to the risks of climate change is also correlated with class, race, revenue, and other factors that usually expose poorer people to higher risks from environmental disasters.”


Residents of the United States have seen climate change as something that’s far off in the distance for also long, Maibach mentioned, and they’ve been misled to believe that tidy energy isn’t affordable although. He mentioned tidy energy could become our primary source of energy once politicians are prepared to assist us adopt these energy sources on an enormous scale.


“The reality of tidy energy is that it is inexpensive and willing to be our primary source of energy, if our elected officials would create the level playing field it needs to succeed in the marketplace,” Maibach mentioned. “Fossil fuel dollars speak loudly and clearly in the marketplace of ideas. Unfortunately, they don’t tell the truth.”


Thor Benson writers about criminal justice, LGBTQ issues, women's rights, politics, illegal narcotics, immigrant rights, the climate, free speech, religion, privacy for The Atlantic, The Day-to-day Beast, Vice, Rolling Stone, ATTN: and elsewhere.


Ever wondered how several candidates under age 30 are running in your state? MTV News has got you covered. Click here for the map.